The platform

One graph. Many signals. Human judgment on top.

FraudBrain is an intelligence platform in the literal sense: it fuses records into evidence, scores what it sees, and puts a ranked queue in front of the people with the authority to act. This page describes how it thinks, at the altitude a CISO or an SIU head expects. It does not describe the mechanics.

The evidence graph

Everything becomes a node or an edge.

Applications, quotes, payments, commission ledgers and post-sale carrier evidence are fused into one graph of producers, applicants, instruments and origins. Fraud hides in connections. The graph is where connections live.

How it thinks

Records in. A record out. Six stages, one of them human.

Every producer travels this path continuously. Nothing on it is a black box to the people who use it, and nothing on it acts on a person by itself.

How it thinks · records to recordCapability view · no mechanics
RECORDS IN GRAPH SCORE QUEUE HUMAN RECORD 01 IN apps · payments 02 FUSE nodes · edges 03 SCORE models, signals 04 RANK evidence-ranked 05 HUMAN a human decides 06 LOG who, when, why ━ signal path   ━ the human step   every stage keeps its source and time the loop closes: confirmed human verdicts feed stage 03, and no release may regress on them
The path every producer travels, drawn in the production interface's own language. Stages, not mechanics. The score never skips stage 05.
01 · Continuous monitoring

A live cadence, not a review season

The whole book is re-scored continuously, many times a day, and post-sale carrier evidence lands as it arrives. A pattern that forms this morning is in the queue today, not in next quarter's audit.

02 · The evidence ledger

Append-only, sourced, timed

Every signal keeps its source and its time. Evidence is added, never overwritten, so a reviewer can always see what was known, when, and from where. The ledger is the case file.

03 · Human adjudication

A person, and a logged decision record

The queue ends at a human. Review, notes and the outcome are recorded with who, when and why. The record belongs to your organization and travels with the file.

04 · The evaluation gate

Never regress on a confirmed case

Every scoring change is measured against confirmed cases before it ships. If it would lose a case the engine already catches, it does not ship. The gate blocks the release, not a person.

05 · Multi-facet signals

Identity, origin, instrument, behaviour, outcome

Signals are read across five facets: who the applicant is, where the application came from, what paid for it, how the producer behaves over time, and what happened to the policy after issue. One facet is a hint. Five, in agreement, are a case.

06 · Per-organization tenancy

Carriers and BGAs, each in their own room

Every organization sees exactly its own book. The boundary is enforced server-side on every request and proven by isolation tests that block a deploy when they fail.

07 · Ask FraudBrain

Plain-language questions, with the scope disclosed

Ask about a producer, a downline, or who to look at first this week. Every answer is scoped to your organization's own book, and says so, every time. It answers questions. It does not act on anyone.

Scoring

Continuously scored. Carefully shipped.

The models

Machine-learned and engineered

Learned models score the patterns that repeat. Engineered signals encode what investigators already know. They work together, and they are allowed to disagree.

The cadence

Continuous, not quarterly

The whole book is rescored around the clock. New evidence lands in the next walk of the graph, not in the next audit cycle.

The discipline

The regression gate

Scoring changes are evaluated against a held-out set of confirmed cases before release. If precision on confirmed cases drops, the change does not ship.

The numbers

Live-fed, aggregate-only

The production metrics on this site are aggregate counts, refreshed on a schedule and published only when the refresh fully succeeds. Nobody types a statistic here.

Humans in the loop

The system surfaces. People decide.

FraudBrain's specialists maintain the models and review what the system surfaces for quality. Decisions about producers belong to your organization: your investigators, your procedures, your record.

Advisory by design

A score determines no action. The system never clears, declines or terminates anyone. It builds the case file and ranks it; a person makes every call.

Every review teaches

Confirmed human verdicts become training signal, so the engine sharpens against threat patterns that will not sit still.

Scoped at the server

Every organization sees exactly its own book. Boundaries are enforced server-side on every request and proven by deploy-blocking isolation tests.

Beyond insurance

The engine travels.

Entities, origins, instruments, relationships. The graph does not care which industry the ledger came from. Life insurance distribution is deployment one, chosen because fraud hides best where the money moves fastest. Everything else is a data feed away.

What we will not publish

The mechanics stay off the public internet. That is a policy, not an oversight.

You will not find on this site the thresholds, the weights, the time windows, the names of individual signals, the model features, or the sources behind any signal. Every mechanic we publish is a mechanic a ring can route around, and the rings read vendor websites too. What we do publish is the shape of the system, the posture, and the guarantees: scores advise, people decide, nothing regresses on a confirmed case, every organization sees only its own book.

The full architecture, mechanics included, is walked through under agreement during the review. Bring your data people.

Ask us the hard questions.

Architecture reviews are how every deployment starts. Bring your data people.

Request an architecture review

A human reads every request. Prefer email? hello@fraudbrain.ai